Skip to main content

Transformers: The Last Knight (2017), PG-13, ★


*sighs* Another Transformers movie. I'm not going to waste too much energy writing this review because this incoherent franchise has gone beyond comprehension. All I can say is that this movie is a tad better than the fourth movie and it still sucked.

Forgive me for not making this review coherent because this movie definitely lacks coherence. So, the movie opens in England in the Dark Ages in which King Arthur and his knights are in the middle of an epic battle, losing men left and right. Arthur awaits his last hope, Merlin (Stanley Tucci) to help them. But, most knights dismiss him as a drunk. Nevertheless, Merlin finds a Cybertronian Knight and asks for help in the fight. The Knight presents Merlin with a powerful staff which allows him to control Dragonstorm. Merlin brings the enemies down with that staff.

In the present day, Optimus Prime (voiced by Peter Cullen) is seen floating in space while frozen. The Transformers have been deemed illegal on Earth as most of the Autobots have gone into hiding. The Transformers Reaction Force, led by Santos (Santiago Cabrera), are hired to eliminate any Transformers. Meanwhile, Optimus comes across to the home planet of Cybertron, nearly in ruins. One of the creators, Quintessa, manipulates him into destroying the Earth, claiming that the planet is Cybertron's enemy, Unicron. She thinks that it could be Cybertron once again.

Cade Yeager (Mark Wahlberg) is also in hiding because he had teamed up with the Autobots in the last movie. He is at a junkyard with other fellow robots. Cade has been followed by Izabella (Isabela Moner) and its Autobot friend, Sqweeks after an attack in Chicago. She is a survivor from the battle of Chicago from the third movie. She wants to help fight and because she has no family, Cade allows her to stay. Oxford professor Vivianne Wembly (Laura Haddock) is taken to the mansion of Sir Edward Burton (Anthony Hopkins), where she meets Cade. He explains why they are here and also the legacy of the Witwiccan order since King Arthur. And, he reveals who is the Last Knight and it is ridiculous.


Oh my God...you know what? I'm going to do something different. Let's save my criticisms. I'll comment that most of the visual effects are crisp and sharper than ever. I will admit that in the last movie the special effects looked odd. The opening is cool and it could have worked as a short movie. Isabela Moner and Mark Wahlberg are decent but the characters are not as fleshed out.

This is one of the most confusing movies I have ever seen from both a narrative standpoint and an editing standpoint. It's basically a standard "destroy the world" story in which the bad guys, the Deceptions, would want to fry all human life on Earth so they can transform Earth into their own planet. But, then, the action sequences are noisy, convoluted and there were, at times, that I was lost as to who was fighting who in the climax in Stonehenge. There is way too many sub-stories going on regarding Yeager's personal story, the main story, the subplot surrounding Izabella and the flashbacks regarding King Arthur. It's noise and a disorganized structure. In addition to that, you have the standard cliches you see in a Michael Bay movie: a lot of patriotic shots, slo-mo shots, robotic stereotypes, a sexualized character and one of the worst characters ever which is a butler. And, plus, the dialogue is what kills the movie again. It felt so artificial and not as fluid.

I will admit that there is a story in here but he and his crew needed to strip so much away to make it a tighter Transformers movie. It could have been an hour and a half. But, nope, he needed to add an hour more to add more spectacle than story. That's what I do not understand. Michael Bay wants to just have cool spectacle and Industrial Light and Magic can take care of the visual effects. Why he cannot focus on the story more? And, then he creates the story and then just adds as much tripe as he can. It seems he plainly abandons the story on purpose with so much fluff that we, the audience, want to get the hell out of the theater. The movie is like a merry-go-round that starts fine but then it accelerates to a quick pace and you cannot step down for two and a half hours. Is it entertaining? No. It's dumbfounded and mind-numbing. It's better than the second and fourth movies but there's not  achievement in the narrative just in the visuals. But, I cannot give him the benefit of the doubt. Bay knows better.

*


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2015 Documentaries

I have only seen 6 documentaries this year which also includes Amy and I Am Chris Farley . But, I have to be honest, this has not been a particularly strong year for documentaries except for onethat got me emotionally and mentally as what I examine for when they uncover the truth or some facts from the people involved in these documentaries. But, here are the four I have seen this year: Listen To Me Marlon, Unrated, 4 stars This is the most insightful documentary of the year as we only hear Marlon Brando narrating his life and experiences what he has gone through regarding his family, his private life and his film experiences regarding The Godfather , Apocalypse Now , Last Tango in Paris , etc. It is like Marlon Brando came out of his grave to give us another profoundly moving movie only we hear his voice and scenery and nothing else. The Look of Silence, R, 3.5 stars Joshua Oppenheimer's follow-up documentary is a light-hearted but still-disturbing film regarding a ...

Daddy's Home 2 (2017), PG-13, ★1/2

The first Daddy's Home was surprisingly a financial success as I thought it was not as bad as many people thought. I thought it was a solid cable watch because it had enough laughs for that sort of mixed recommendation. I was not craving for a sequel for this movie because again, comedy sequels have a very bad record, however, the only difference is that it is not too late since the first movie came out a few years ago. But, this sequel is a reminder as to why we do not need a sequel to a hit comedy because this is a pretty much forgettable comedy, especially a holiday comedy...which I hade a guilty pleasure for. This did not work for me. Brad and Dusty (Will Ferrell and Mark Wahlberg) have become friends after the events of the first film and they set up a co-dad system where their two children, Megan and Dylan, spending time at each father's home. Dusty has re-married to writer Karen (Victoria's Secret model Alessandra Ambrosio) and he is step-dad to Adrianna, Karen...

The Wolf of Wall Street (2013), R, 4 stars

The stockbrokers worshipping Jordan Belfort (Leonardo DiCaprio) like a god. Wall Street. The clients, the adrenaline, the stocks, the money, the power, and the decadence. The former three pertains to the man's job, but the latter three pertains what any stockbroker wants in order to have the freedom to do whatever they want with the client's money. As Mark Hanna (Matthew McConaughey) would say, "The name of the game is: move the money from your client's pocket into your pocket." We basically spend three hours seeing all of these Wall-Street scumbags steal the clients' money into their own pockets and spend it on booze, drugs, women, and other insane things in more insane activities. I have witnessed here is a great movie that I would not watch repetitively. The movie starts with Jordan Belfort (Leonardo DiCaprio) blowing cocaine onto a hooker's butt and he and his brokers throwing a little person onto a board with a dollar sign in the center. It'...