Skip to main content

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (2018), PG-13, ★★


It is amazing that the Harry Potter universe is continuing on after the success of the movies and also with children still continuing to read books. When I was there in a set of Diagon Alley at Universal Studios at Orlando, people were gathering in different areas like it was a hangout near a university. And, I was impressed by the details going into the set of Diagon Alley that I felt like I was a wizard for a moment in that fantastical universe. The franchise is certainly a phenomenon. But, studios are hungry for squeezing some more money out of the franchise as the first Fantastic Beasts was fine. The sequel is visually magical but not narratively as there is so much exposition and plot underneath the characters and its story that the whole film becomes disjointed and a bit confusing. It is like going into a magical SAT exam after a teacher just gave you the book with solely the material and no practice exams with it.

Notorious dark wizard Gilbert Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) has escaped from being put into prison in London. He is on a mission to find his followers. Meanwhile, back in London, Newt Scamander is given another chance to get his travel rights after the events of his beasts being loose in New York and Creedence Barebone (Ezra Miller) wreaked havoc. However, the Ministry gives a condition that he will work under Theseus (Callum Turner), Newt's brother, with whom Newt has a strained relationship with. Although Newt refuses to work with him, an Auror named Grimmson (Ingvar Edgar Sigurosson) volunteers but he is up to sinister deeds.

Later on, Newt apparates to meet with his former professor, Albus Dumbledore (Jude Law). Dumbledores appoints Newt to seek out Creedence as Grindelwald is also seeking him out, since he is in danger or a danger to others. Dumbledore leaves Newt with an address to a safe house since Dumbledore cannot move against Grindelwald. Newt re-teams with Jacob Kowalski (Dan Fogler), who now has a relationship with Queenie (Alison Sudol) to find Creedence. But, also, later on, Newt finds Tina (Katherine Waterston) who is also on a mission to find Creedence.


This movie is more underwhelming and more uneventful than Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, which was my former least favorite film of the franchise. Here, this movie is like Rocky Balboa or later, trying to catch a chicken and would not catch it after two hours. I never got to the point as to the whole story feeling as completed in its contained movie before it is left off with a cliffhanger. The movie should have clipped off 30 minutes of the film as the middle portion felt dragged with Grindlewald's scenes and also flashbacks that felt unnecessary. It bounces all over the place.

I never seem to grasp Eddie Redmayne being Newt Scamander here than I did in the first one as he is a solid introductory character. Here, he annoyed a bit with him not looking at characters in the eye nor being as charismatic or memorable compared to other characters like Jacob played Dan Fogler, who is still great as the amicable sidekick. I liked Jude Law very much as he fit the role of a young Albus Dumbledore quite well, he is brilliant yet also fashionable compared to what his persona will become in future books and movies. Zoe Kravitz is ok as Leta and Katherine Waterston is still solid while working alongside Redmayne. Now, Johnny Depp felt like a scary Halloween distraction than a menacing villain because he feels like an icy guy that seems to spew out spells and dialogue that feels monotone. But, besides Jacob and Dumbledore, I could not connect to many of its characters.

David Yates returns to the director's chair as he made this film and I feel like his time has run out in the series and let someone else to take over because I felt that this latest installment was slow, filled with heavy exposition and plot that does not seem to intertwine and anticlimactic character decisions that felt contrived. The action is solid, the visual effects are fine (a few cheesy SFX moments) and some good performances but I think this is the first Harry Potter movie where I felt like that this was boring. I need to Obliviate myself to move on and to forget this experience.

**


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Handmaiden (2016), Unrated, ★★★1/2

What are you up to? Huh? I heard some praise from a few people I know that have seen this film and I was a bit skeptical because unfortunately I do not get the chance to see many foreign films. This movie is based on a British novel that is transposed to a Korean story under a Japanese ruler. I was going into this cold not knowing what the title could lead to or what the story will be about and how this movie will unfold. And, I have to say: Know a little bit of the plot but not much else because the result is a harrowing experience that is twisted, disturbing, erotic, and most of all, classical with such disciplined filmmaking by director Park Chan-Wook. A con man hires a pickpocket named Sook-hee (Kim Tae-ri), who is well-known as she comes from a family of con artists, to become Lady Hideko's (Kim Min-hee) handmaiden. Her mission is to convince Hideko to reject her barbarous uncle, Kouzuki (Cho Jin-Woong) and marry Fujiwara (Ha Jung-Woo), who hired Sook-hee. Kouzuki's

The Best Films of the Year (1999, 2003-2023)

I've posted my lists of the best films over the years, 1999, 2003-2023. You can take a look and glance at them. (Revised on 04/22/2024). 1999 1. The Insider  (Mann) 2. Magnolia  (Anderson) 3. The Matrix  (Wachowskis) 4. Being John Malkovich  (Jonze) 5. Fight Club  (Fincher) 6. The Straight Story  (Lynch) 7. The Talented Mr. Ripley  (Minghella) 8. Eyes Wide Shut  (Kubrick)  9. The Iron Giant  (Bird) 10. American Beauty  (Mendes) 11. The Sixth Sense  (Shyamalan) 12. Topsy-Turvy  (Leigh) 13. Toy Story 2  (Lasseter) 14. All About My Mother  (Almodovar) 15. Galaxy Quest  (Parisot) 2003 1. The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King  (Jackson) 2. Lost In Translation   (Coppola) 3. Finding Nemo   (Stanton) 4. Mystic River   (Eastwood) 5. Kill Bill Vol. 1   (Tarantino) 6. Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World  (Weir) 7. In America   (Sheridan) 8. Elf   (Favreau) 9. Whale Rider   (Caro) 10. Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl   (Verbinski) 2004 1. Milli

The Grinch (2018), PG, ★★1/2

"You're a mean one, Mr. Grinch..." I am a fan of Dr. Seuss' classic book as it surrounds this green curmudgeon that fits in the category of grumpiness alongside Ebenezer Scrooge from Charles Dickens' A Christmas Carol. Along a couple of other of Dr. Seuss books, How The Grinch Stole Christmas  was repeatedly read by me during my childhood. I am hoping that children are not so drawn into the movies that they completely ignore the book. Because ever since the classic short TV film, there was a movie made by Ron Howard and starring Jim Carrey that felt boring and languid. Although, I did adore Carrey's performance but it's everything about him that made the film overlong and deserted. But, there are some fans of the film so everybody is entitled to their opinion on that movie. So, we have another Grinch film for another batch of generations who want to re-live the story again. And, the bottom line is that it is not a total dud but thanks to the vibrant h