Skip to main content

Jack Reacher: Never Go Back (2016), PG-13, ★1/2


Hold on. I thought the title was called Jack Reacher: NEVER GO BACK. Hmmm...ok. While I was watching the first movie a few years ago, I thought the action sequences were well-crafted and well-choreographed with the hand fighting and the car chases. But, somehow, the story did not as engage me like Cruise's action films such as the Mission Impossible franchise or Minority Report. It felt like that the story somehow was not crafted as well that the villains by Werner Herzog and Jai Courtney amped the film up a bit. With the sequel, there is not much with its filmmaking, it is just that the story felt predictable that its execution was marginal and does not offer anything original or exciting. And, that is a shame because this is a Tom Cruise action movie that we are watching.

Police arrive at a scene in which four people have been beaten down to the ground and an onlooker tells the officers that one man pummeled them all within seconds. Sheriff Raymond Wood (Jason Douglas) and his deputy enter the diner to find Jack Reacher (Tom Cruise) sitting by the counter all bloodied. They cuff him and prepare to take him away until Reacher says that in 90 seconds, the phone will ring and Wood will be wearing handcuffs for kidnapping and selling undocumented immigrants on military soil. Well, the phone rings and then military police takes them away.

Reacher arrives at the military HQ and finds Col. Morgan (Holt McCallany) sitting by the desk where Reacher was expecting to find Major Susan Turner (Cobie Smulders), who saves Reacher from being arrested. Morgan informs him that Turner has been arrested for possible espionage. Reacher tries to get some help to clear Turner's name. Then, later, Col. Moorcroft (Robert Caprini) brings up a paternity suit to Reacher that claims that he is the father to a daughter named Samantha (Danika Yarosh). Reacher is being watched by a man known as the Hunter (Patrick Heusinger) who is hired to kill him.


I was very disappointed by the outcome of this movie because there was nothing surprising by the movie's plot, characters, side story or villain. The action is well choreographed and produced with some good one-liners by Cruise but the dialogue surrounding the plot and in conversation is baffling. The character development did not feel thought provoking because the story felt like it was a 90s script from a TV show. This is more like a pilot episode to a 13-episode series and then we have to wait to see if the studio is willing enough to renew it. The movie is more serviceable to the Tom Cruise fans who want to see him just be there.

Speaking of which, it is still awesome to see Cruise kick some butt, however, his character is sort of sleepwalking and just strutting like he is one calculated, cool character. Cruise does not provide any heft or personality this time around. And, he and Cobie Smulders have no chemistry whatsoever as they are just side by side or one character's story has to pause in order for the other's story to overlap on so we can have a by-the-numbers climax. Yarosh who plays the daughter is fine and the villains are weak this time around and they may be a few of the weakest villains in an action movie in a long time.

What is happening with director Edward Zwick? He has made four bad movies in a row: Defiance, Love and Other Drugs (Hathaway's and Gyllenhaal's chemistry was sweet but the story was uninteresting), Pawn Sacrifice (boring) and this movie. He was one of the most competent filmmakers and he has gone downhill with his works. There are a few stagnant signature action moments that fits his filmmaking style but there is nothing original brought on to the screen. I can predict about everything almost 30 minutes away from when the scene will be presented like its climax and what will happen to the characters. I'm afraid that this is one of Tom Cruise's worst movies and this will be an air of dust a year from now once we get his next movie and also another Mission: Impossible movie.

*1/2


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2015 Documentaries

I have only seen 6 documentaries this year which also includes Amy and I Am Chris Farley . But, I have to be honest, this has not been a particularly strong year for documentaries except for onethat got me emotionally and mentally as what I examine for when they uncover the truth or some facts from the people involved in these documentaries. But, here are the four I have seen this year: Listen To Me Marlon, Unrated, 4 stars This is the most insightful documentary of the year as we only hear Marlon Brando narrating his life and experiences what he has gone through regarding his family, his private life and his film experiences regarding The Godfather , Apocalypse Now , Last Tango in Paris , etc. It is like Marlon Brando came out of his grave to give us another profoundly moving movie only we hear his voice and scenery and nothing else. The Look of Silence, R, 3.5 stars Joshua Oppenheimer's follow-up documentary is a light-hearted but still-disturbing film regarding a ...

Daddy's Home 2 (2017), PG-13, ★1/2

The first Daddy's Home was surprisingly a financial success as I thought it was not as bad as many people thought. I thought it was a solid cable watch because it had enough laughs for that sort of mixed recommendation. I was not craving for a sequel for this movie because again, comedy sequels have a very bad record, however, the only difference is that it is not too late since the first movie came out a few years ago. But, this sequel is a reminder as to why we do not need a sequel to a hit comedy because this is a pretty much forgettable comedy, especially a holiday comedy...which I hade a guilty pleasure for. This did not work for me. Brad and Dusty (Will Ferrell and Mark Wahlberg) have become friends after the events of the first film and they set up a co-dad system where their two children, Megan and Dylan, spending time at each father's home. Dusty has re-married to writer Karen (Victoria's Secret model Alessandra Ambrosio) and he is step-dad to Adrianna, Karen...

The Wolf of Wall Street (2013), R, 4 stars

The stockbrokers worshipping Jordan Belfort (Leonardo DiCaprio) like a god. Wall Street. The clients, the adrenaline, the stocks, the money, the power, and the decadence. The former three pertains to the man's job, but the latter three pertains what any stockbroker wants in order to have the freedom to do whatever they want with the client's money. As Mark Hanna (Matthew McConaughey) would say, "The name of the game is: move the money from your client's pocket into your pocket." We basically spend three hours seeing all of these Wall-Street scumbags steal the clients' money into their own pockets and spend it on booze, drugs, women, and other insane things in more insane activities. I have witnessed here is a great movie that I would not watch repetitively. The movie starts with Jordan Belfort (Leonardo DiCaprio) blowing cocaine onto a hooker's butt and he and his brokers throwing a little person onto a board with a dollar sign in the center. It'...