Skip to main content

Nerve (2016), PG-13, ★★1/2

She's playing a game. It's not The Game, though.
The Internet is a haven for people to get access onto any coverage that entices people to get sucked into an environment that seems entertaining, informative or from reality. Nowadays, I believe it is easier for hackers or thieves to conceptualize a game or plan onto a site and seduces customers or viewers to do whatever they want for pleasure or for money. It is ironic and scary for this movie to be released during the time in which many people are playing Pokemon GO that propels many teenagers or young adults to go outside and look for Pokemon for points. It is a smart app with a few pros and cons. But, this is not a business blog. Nevertheless, this movie spawns a cool idea and intriguing premise, the movie is thin on unnecessary supporting characters and the plot veers onto dark territory that becomes not as engaging nor as addressed as an informative message.

Venus "Vee" Delmonico (Emma Roberts) is a high school senior living in Staten Island. She gets a Skype chat notification from her friend, Sydney (Emily Meade). Syd mentions a game called "Nerve" in which involves "watchers" and "players" - the players are given dares in exchange for money, the watches pay to watch everything happen. Syd has signed on to to play and invites Vee to play, but she declines. Vee wants to go to college but she cannot hide the fact that she and her mother, Nancy (Juliette Lewis) are still grieving after the loss of Vee's brother.

After a negative response from Vee's crush, J.P. (Brian Marc), Vee goes home upset and logs onto the Nerve website and is told the rules before she makes her move. If they do not record themselves and perform the dare, they lose all their money. Also, nobody can snitch on Nerve, otherwise, it ends badly. Ver calls one of her friends, Tommy (Miles Hezier), for dinner as she has to kiss a stranger for five seconds for $100. She spots Ian (Dave Franco) and Tommy records them kissing, while he has a bit of a crush on her. Ian later goes to Vee's table to go to the city with him for $200. They leave on a motorcycle, leaving Tommy behind. Their adventure begins.

Dave Franco on a motorcycle.
This movie is nifty and swift as we go along the journey with Ian and Vee and many supporting players. However, that is a problem. I was particularly invested in the two main characters and a few supporting characters so I felt there some unnecessary supporting characters just to support the protagonist and or explore what is going on in their own game. I actually wanted to know what started the "Nerve" game, who started it and why because from its execution, the game was just set up to play. We do not get to explore much insight as to the creator's background or the creator.

Emma Roberts and Dave Franco individually are not as appealing as she has to deal with her being an introverted senior with goals and Franco being heavily involved with the game because of one purpose. But, together, they both have chemistry and that's when most of the film actually worked. The supporting characters regarding Vee's friends are mostly pawns in the game as they try to find out what is going on with Vee and also trying to get Vee to escape from the game as it transitions the tone to fun techno thriller to a dark cyber-thriller. I found it more fun in the first half.

Thinking about it after leaving the theater, I thought, "Dang, this is a scary type of movie because it is probably happening right now". I felt that the better movie which sets up this type of "dare" game is David Fincher's underrated film, The Game. Fincher's movie integrates suspense and strange things into the investment banker's life and become of an apparent suspicion. It gets you hooked. I felt like there was very little suspense even though there is a solid payoff in the end but it was mostly a tonal shift to manipulate me into getting Vee's life back. It is not earned. Directors Henry Joost and Ariel Schulman paces the film real well and it is a stylistic thriller, however, the second half of its story was a bit hokey into manipulating the characters into a dark climax that become pretentious. I'd say it would be a cool movie to watch on cable or to rent. It's not a bad movie but there's little insight in this story for me to care about its characters' fates.

**1/2


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2015 Documentaries

I have only seen 6 documentaries this year which also includes Amy and I Am Chris Farley . But, I have to be honest, this has not been a particularly strong year for documentaries except for onethat got me emotionally and mentally as what I examine for when they uncover the truth or some facts from the people involved in these documentaries. But, here are the four I have seen this year: Listen To Me Marlon, Unrated, 4 stars This is the most insightful documentary of the year as we only hear Marlon Brando narrating his life and experiences what he has gone through regarding his family, his private life and his film experiences regarding The Godfather , Apocalypse Now , Last Tango in Paris , etc. It is like Marlon Brando came out of his grave to give us another profoundly moving movie only we hear his voice and scenery and nothing else. The Look of Silence, R, 3.5 stars Joshua Oppenheimer's follow-up documentary is a light-hearted but still-disturbing film regarding a ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Daddy's Home 2 (2017), PG-13, ★1/2

The first Daddy's Home was surprisingly a financial success as I thought it was not as bad as many people thought. I thought it was a solid cable watch because it had enough laughs for that sort of mixed recommendation. I was not craving for a sequel for this movie because again, comedy sequels have a very bad record, however, the only difference is that it is not too late since the first movie came out a few years ago. But, this sequel is a reminder as to why we do not need a sequel to a hit comedy because this is a pretty much forgettable comedy, especially a holiday comedy...which I hade a guilty pleasure for. This did not work for me. Brad and Dusty (Will Ferrell and Mark Wahlberg) have become friends after the events of the first film and they set up a co-dad system where their two children, Megan and Dylan, spending time at each father's home. Dusty has re-married to writer Karen (Victoria's Secret model Alessandra Ambrosio) and he is step-dad to Adrianna, Karen...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Wolf of Wall Street (2013), R, 4 stars

The stockbrokers worshipping Jordan Belfort (Leonardo DiCaprio) like a god. Wall Street. The clients, the adrenaline, the stocks, the money, the power, and the decadence. The former three pertains to the man's job, but the latter three pertains what any stockbroker wants in order to have the freedom to do whatever they want with the client's money. As Mark Hanna (Matthew McConaughey) would say, "The name of the game is: move the money from your client's pocket into your pocket." We basically spend three hours seeing all of these Wall-Street scumbags steal the clients' money into their own pockets and spend it on booze, drugs, women, and other insane things in more insane activities. I have witnessed here is a great movie that I would not watch repetitively. The movie starts with Jordan Belfort (Leonardo DiCaprio) blowing cocaine onto a hooker's butt and he and his brokers throwing a little person onto a board with a dollar sign in the center. It'...
Post a Comment
Read more